Category: MOVIE REVIEWS

Anna, 2019 – ★★

Clunky choreography and wooden pacing drag down what should have been a slick, stylish ride. Even the trademark flair of Luc Besson can’t save this from feeling like Yawn Wick.

Warfare, 2025 – ★★★★

Unflinching and immersive, it captures the brutality and confusion of combat with terrifying authenticity—tense, visceral, and hard to shake.

The Unthinkable, 2018 – ★★★

Grounded and intense, it paints a chillingly believable picture of societal collapse. Imperfect, but its realism leaves a strong impression.

It Feeds, 2025 – ★★

Has the bones of a good creature feature but drags too often to build real tension. A few eerie moments can’t save the sluggish pace.

Mickey 17, 2025 – ★★★

Ambitious and full of potential, it keeps you intrigued but never quite delivers the punch it promises. Almost great — just missing that final spark.

Drop, 2025 – ★★★

A clever premise keeps things engaging, and the ride is fun if you’re into high-concept setups. Just don’t expect the title to fully cash its check.

The Monkey, 2025 – ★★

Swings between horror, grief, and comedy without ever finding the right branch to land on. Uneven pacing and tonal whiplash keep it from being more than a curiosity.

Cold Fish, 2010 – ★★★

It started off really strong, but I have no idea why it needed to be 2.5 hours—the middle dragged quite a bit. Thankfully, the wild ending helped bring it back around.

Opus, 2025 – ★★

Visually slick and full of mood, but it meanders without much payoff. Ends up feeling more like a vibe experiment than a fully formed narrative.

The Ambulance, 1990 – ★★★

A cheesy blend of suspense and camp with a gloriously dated style. It’s uneven but fun, and the sheer strangeness keeps it from ever getting dull.

Shark Lake, 2015 – ★★

Outside of a few fun B-movie moments, there’s not much bite here. Worth a glance for fans of Sara Malakul Lane, but otherwise skippable.