Boogeyman, 2005 – ★★
Well-shot but pointless, it adds nothing new and feels like a studio checklist rather than a story worth telling.
Well-shot but pointless, it adds nothing new and feels like a studio checklist rather than a story worth telling.
Sharp, stylish, and emotionally resonant—everything clicks in a way that’s rare. A sci-fi standout with real staying power.
Goofy, gory, and totally of its era—feels like Craven caught between two worlds, and the result is strangely delightful.
Goes all in on shock value but forgets to build anything worth caring about. Feels more desperate than dangerous.
Disturbing and relentlessly intense—an unflinching descent into madness with a lead performance that’s pure nightmare fuel.
Stylish but sluggish, it drowns in mood and drags out the runtime—atmosphere alone can’t save it.
A priest battling a demonic snake shouldn’t work this well—but it’s surprisingly entertaining and holds its own in the sea of knockoffs.
Heavy on the hokey and light on the scares—feels more like a sales pitch than a supernatural thriller.
Pure B-movie madness that embraces the absurd—goofy, gory, and exactly the kind of trashy fun it promises.
Doesn’t quite hit the heights it aims for, but strong visuals and moments of genuine mood keep it worthwhile.
Bursting with energy and heart, it’s rough around the edges but powered by pure passion. A bold debut that leaves a mark.
Tense and character-driven, with emotional depth that slowly unfolds. A small-scale crime story that punches above its weight.
Simple premise, solid execution—it leans into the heat and claustrophobia just enough to stay interesting.
Completely bonkers in the best way—uneven but unforgettable, with one of the wildest creature reveals you’ll ever see.
Tense and inventive with enough style to stand out. Not everything lands, but it keeps you locked in from start to finish.