Good Boy, 2025 – ★★★
Inventive and surprisingly effective, the canine perspective adds a fresh layer to a familiar thriller setup.
Inventive and surprisingly effective, the canine perspective adds a fresh layer to a familiar thriller setup.
Intense, layered, and expertly crafted—it not only meets the hype but blows past it. A gripping ride.
Low-budget charm and goofy energy make this a perfect slice of regional horror comfort food. Pure 90s fun.
Wild, messy, and unapologetically Begos—flawed but bursting with energy and attitude. You’ve got to admire the swing.
Mean-spirited and tightly wound, it’s a grim, unsettling ride that sticks in your head long after.
Relentlessly tense and deeply unsettling—a masterclass in sustained dread.
Competently made and well-acted, but plays it far too safe to justify revisiting the material.
Mark Hamill shines, elevating a solid and engaging story. A strong genre outing even though I am not the biggest Stephen King fan.
Starts off promising but crashes hard by the end—an infuriating finish to an already hollow film.
Cheap, uninspired, and painfully dull—an empty cash-in with nothing to offer but frustration.
Drawn-out and repetitive, it stretches a thin idea well past its breaking point. Style without momentum.
Ambitious and uneven, but the effort shows—blending familiar concepts into something that’s at least engaging.
Lifeless and filler-like, it exists only to bridge the gap to another sequel no one asked for.
Unsettling and raw, it earns its reputation with a slow build that explodes into pure chaos. Hard to shake once it’s over.