Author: chris

Predictable but gleefully savage, it delivers the bloody goods with style. You won’t be surprised, but you will be entertained.

Sleek and skillful, with a haunting precision—may resonate even more on a second watch. A strong showcase of craft.

Utterly by-the-numbers with no spark or identity of its own—just another forgettable entry in the ghost story pile.

Quietly unsettling and emotionally heavy, it offers a fresh, mournful spin on the undead that lingers long after.

Offensive title aside, it’s a rough, tasteless ride—but somehow the ending manages to stick better than expected.

Exactly what you’d expect from the name—silly, shallow, and proudly ridiculous, but not much beyond the gimmick.

Dripping with ’80s vibes and practical goo—it’s dated in the best way, with just enough weird to keep it fun.

Ultimately just another slow crawl through well-worn horror territory with nothing new to say.

Passable horror with a decent hook, but it never rises above average. You’ll forget it by the time the credits roll.

Stunning to behold, but the déjà vu is hard to shake. Style nearly makes up for the lack of fresh perspective.

Hooks you with its visuals and keeps you around with a thoughtful core. Familiar ideas, but presented with style and care.

Ambitious in structure but lacking in payoff, the threads feel disconnected and the themes half-baked.

Completely absurd but not in a way that works—Cage gives it his all, but even he can’t sell this laughably miscast adventure.

Loud, lifeless, and strangely empty, it’s a disappointing swan song for a director who once had real flair.

Has style, charm, and chemistry to spare—but it overstays its welcome. Trim the fat and it could’ve really soared.