Author: chris

Lacks the goofy charm and energy of its predecessor—more slog than spectacle, with fewer thrills than expected.

What once terrified me as a kid now charms—silly, spooky fun with lovable little monsters and a cozy creature-feature vibe.

Gleefully bizarre and soaked in early ’80s weirdness, it’s a messy but memorable ride through supernatural mayhem.

Visually eerie but narratively muddled, it leans too hard on ambiguity. If you need a guide to understand it, something’s off.

Solid talent wasted on a script that never rises above formula. Familiar beats and cheap scares drag it down.

Surprisingly gripping with a mean streak that keeps things tense. Exceeds expectations and then some.

Tries to coast on atmosphere but never builds a strong enough foundation—by the time the twist hits, it’s too little, too late.

Too offbeat for its own good, with grating characters and a script that leans hard on tired horror tropes.

Plays every haunted-house note by the book, with nothing new to say. Just another tired spirit overstaying its welcome.

Nowhere near the accidental magic of the original, but the chaos and Wiseau weirdness make it a worthy, if baffling, follow-up.

Still delivers the punches, the swagger, and that irresistible Ma Dong-seok charm. Bring on twenty more—I’ll be watching every one.

Stretched thin and far too drawn out, it loses momentum early and never quite finds the road back.

Tries hard to be wild and witty but lands with a thud—loud, chaotic, and rarely as smart as it thinks it is.

Bold premise aside, it struggles to find the right tone and never quite lands.

Surreal to a fault, it buries any real impact beneath layers of forced quirk. Feels more like a sketch reel than a cohesive film.